So, even if congressional folk sincerely think the data doesn't prove that global warming is yet in a crisis state, or that the USA can make a significant contribution toward slowing down global warming, why wouldn't they act to err on the side of safety rather than on the side of recklessness (by omitting effective action)? The stakes are high.
What can individuals and small groups do to make a difference in global warming? Could we each work with our local governments to qualify as cool cities? Can we ask spokespeople who say we're not in crisis to give us statistics that rival those presented in Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth"?
Monday, December 4, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment